Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Social Media



While researching the topic of Social Media this week, I was fascinated to see how various companies have managed to successfully promote their brand on the Internet through various methods. This article by Samir Balwani does a great job in giving a few examples of this. I was particularly intrigued with the way Starbucks received direct ideas from their customers via the My Starbucks Idea. It is important for a company like Starbucks to know what people want in their coffee. Consumers are very particular about the taste of their coffee and are likely to stick with one they like for the rest of their lives. By getting suggestions directly from the people, Starbucks is not only making an effort to retain existing customers, but also attracting new ones in the process.


I also liked the idea that Comcast came up with in order to satisfy customer service. There are several companies out there that have a Technical Support staff available online that consumers can chat with on their website. However, this requires users to go to the website and initiate a chat themselves. Comcast realized that sometimes customers are angry and are likely to post comments on sites like Twitter creating negative publicity. By having a dedicated staff that attempts to please these customers, Comcast is showing that it truly does care about its service. 

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Making Updates to Existing Websites


As part of week 1, we discussed a few ways a website could (and should) be acceptance tested. Prototypes of the website can be shown to users and the way they navigate through the site can be observed. However, there isn't a proper method out there (if there is one, it isn't being utilized) when existing sites are updated. I have seen many websites that go through a major change in their appearance/layout in order to make user experience easier. Also, companies don't often get their changes tested by all kinds of users - casual and regular. This often leads to negative feedback from users as they prefer to stick to the user interface that they're familiar with.

A very recent example of this is digg.com. Digg recently released a new major version of its site. A lot of beneficial changes were made as part of the redesign. However, this redesign meant that a casual user, such as myself, will have to change the way he/she used the site. Matthew Shaer summarizes the good and bad points of the redesign as part of this article. Furthermore, I also don't like the fact that I don't have the option of using the old layout. They decided to force the new layout onto users whether they like it or not.

What can be changed in the redesign process in order to avoid negative feedback such as this?